Alizio v. Alizio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alizio v. Alizio

60 A.D.2d 832, 400 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9836

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 3, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.2d 832 (Alizio v. Alizio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alizio v. Alizio, 60 A.D.2d 832, 400 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which defendant had previously been granted a judgment of divorce, the parties cross-appeal from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 8, 1976, as amended by a further order of the same court, entered July 6, 1977, which, inter alia, fixed the amount of alimony and arrears in alimony and denied plaintiff’s motion to restore to him the furniture, contents and articles of personal property contained in the former marital home. Amended order modified, on the law, by deleting so much of the sixth decretal paragraph thereof as provides that the "household furniture and contents and personal property be and the same are awarded to the defendant, who is hereby declared to be the owner thereof’, and substituting therefor a provision that defendant shall have the exclusive use and possession of the said household furniture and contents and personal property. As so modified, amended order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Section 234 of the Domestic Relations Law, which authorizes the court to make a direction concerning possession of property, does not empower the court to order transfer of title from one party to the other (McGuigan v McGuigan, 46 AD2d 665). We have considered the parties’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action in which defendant had previously been granted a judgment of divorce, the parties cross-appeal from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 8, 1976, as amended by a further order of the same court, entered July 6, 1977, which, inter alia, fixed the amount of alimony and arrears in alimony and denied plaintiff’s motion to restore to him the furniture, contents and articles of personal property contained in the former marital home. Amended order modified, on the law, by deleting so much of the sixth decretal paragraph thereof as provides that the "household furniture and contents and personal property be and the same are awarded to the defendant, who is hereby declared to be the owner thereof’, and substituting therefor a provision that defendant shall have the exclusive use and possession of the said household furniture and contents and personal property. As so modified, amended order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Section 234 of the Domestic Relations Law, which authorizes the court to make a direction concerning possession of property, does not empower the court to order transfer of title from one party to the other (McGuigan v McGuigan, 46 AD2d 665). We have considered the parties’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 832, 400 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alizio-v-alizio-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack