Alisha Garrett v. Velma Jeter

• Court: Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
• Decided: June 4, 2026
• Docket: 09-25-00186-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-25-00186-CV ________________

ALISHA GARRETT, Appellant

V.

VELMA JETER, Appellee

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Orange County, Texas Trial Cause No. 25508A ________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Alisha Garrett filed a notice of appeal from a judgment granting a writ of

possession in a forcible-detainer action. Garrett did not supersede the judgment. In

her brief, Appellee informed the Court that Garrett vacated the apartment and

removed her possessions from the premises. Because Garrett is no longer in

possession of the premises, Appellee argues the appeal is moot.

1 The only issue in a forcible-detainer action is who has the right to actual

possession of the property. Marshall v. Hous. Auth. of City of San Antonio, 198

S.W.3d 782, 785 (Tex. 2006). A forcible-detainer appeal becomes moot upon an

appellant’s eviction from the property unless the appellant holds and asserts a

meritorious claim of the right to current, actual possession of the property or unless

damages or attorney’s fees remain at issue. Ratliff v. Homes by Ashley, Inc., No. 02-

20-00014-CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 1919, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Mar.

5, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.); see also Leal v. SF Revocable Living Tr., No. 09-15-

00254-CV, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 5755, at *5-8 (Tex. App.—Beaumont June 22,

2017, no pet.) (mem. op.). According to the appellate record, the appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 2 to this Court is on the issue of possession alone, an issue

which is now moot.

Appellant has not shown that a justiciable controversy still exists.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

KENT CHAMBERS Justice

Submitted on June 3, 2026 Opinion Delivered June 4, 2026

Before Golemon, C.J., Wright and Chambers, JJ.