Aliotta v. Gilreath

Supreme Court of Georgia

Aliotta v. Gilreath

168 S.E.2d 314, 225 Ga. 328, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 491

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 22, 1969

Docket25204

StatusPublished

This text of 168 S.E.2d 314 (Aliotta v. Gilreath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aliotta v. Gilreath, 168 S.E.2d 314, 225 Ga. 328, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 491 (Ga. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Whether or not the charter of the Town of Thunderbolt authorizes the Mayor to cast a vote in an election to fill a vacancy in the office of “Mayor, Alderman or Clerk of Council,” the same, does not authorize him to vote in the election and then cast an additional vote to “break the tie” so as to give him two votes; and since no election resulted as such vacancy for alderman must be filled by “a majority vote,” and the defendant Galibert did not receive a majority of the votes cast (3-3 with the Mayor voting), the injunction, under the law and the undisputed facts presented, to restrain and enjoin the defendants as prayed, should have been granted. Cummings v. Robinson, 194 Ga. 336 (21 SE2d 627); Palmer v. Claxton, 206 Ga. 860 (59 SE2d 379). The case is similar to the Cummings case which holds that injunction is the proper remedy. Hence the court erred in denying the injunction and in dismissing the restraining order.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Whether or not the charter of the Town of Thunderbolt authorizes the Mayor to cast a vote in an election to fill a vacancy in the office of “Mayor, Alderman or Clerk of Council,” the same, does not authorize him to vote in the election and then cast an additional vote to “break the tie” so as to give him two votes; and since no election resulted as such vacancy for alderman must be filled by “a majority vote,” and the defendant Galibert did not receive a majority of the votes cast (3-3 with the Mayor voting), the injunction, under the law and the undisputed facts presented, to restrain and enjoin the defendants as prayed, should have been granted. Cummings v. Robinson, 194 Ga. 336 (21 SE2d 627); Palmer v. Claxton, 206 Ga. 860 (59 SE2d 379). The case is similar to the Cummings case which holds that injunction is the proper remedy. Hence the court erred in denying the injunction and in dismissing the restraining order.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 S.E.2d 314, 225 Ga. 328, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aliotta-v-gilreath-ga-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack