Alioto v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Alioto v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 114, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 648

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 20, 1949

DocketNo. 53311; protests 97953-K, etc. (Philadelphia)

StatusPublished

This text of 23 Cust. Ct. 114 (Alioto v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alioto v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 114, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 648 (cusc 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of Scaramelli v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 48269. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of Scaramelli v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 48269. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Cust. Ct. 114, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alioto-v-united-states-cusc-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack