ALIM SHARIF v. CAMDEN SUMMIT PARTNERSHIP LP
This text of ALIM SHARIF v. CAMDEN SUMMIT PARTNERSHIP LP (ALIM SHARIF v. CAMDEN SUMMIT PARTNERSHIP LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ALIM SHARIF, Appellant,
v.
CAMDEN SUMMIT PARTNERSHIP LP d/b/a CAMDEN AVENTURA 505, Appellee.
No. 4D21-53
[February 11, 2021]
Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Davis, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. COSO18-011115 (60) and CACE19-011495 (AP).
Alim Shariff, Hallandale Beach, pro se.
Drew Beinhaker of Henschel and Beinhaker, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
WARNER, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ALIM SHARIF v. CAMDEN SUMMIT PARTNERSHIP LP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alim-sharif-v-camden-summit-partnership-lp-fladistctapp-2021.