Alijah Gadson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Alijah Gadson v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 25, 2025

Docket5D2023-3666

StatusPublished

This text of Alijah Gadson v. State of Florida (Alijah Gadson v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alijah Gadson v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-3666 LT Case No. 2022-CF-10246-A _____________________________

ALIJAH GADSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. London M. Kite, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Alijah Gadson, Sneads, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

April 25, 2025

PER CURIAM.

Alijah Gadson appeals his judgment and sentence following a jury trial. Gadson was found guilty of attempted manslaughter (with a special finding that he carried a firearm) and shooting or throwing deadly missiles. He was sentenced to fifteen years on both counts to run consecutively. The State requested, and the trial court awarded, $5,132.43 costs of prosecution; the written cost order included an award for $100 of prosecution costs as well as the requested $5,132.43.

We affirm Gadson’s judgment and sentence, but remand for a corrected judgment striking the duplicative $100 of prosecution costs, as the statute does not allow for the imposition of both the standard $100 prosecution costs and the requested higher amount. See § 938.27(8), Fla. Stat. (2024) (“Costs for the state attorney must be set in all cases at no less than . . . $100 per case when a felony offense is charged . . . . The court may set a higher amount upon a showing of sufficient proof of higher costs incurred.”).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

MAKAR, WALLIS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-3666 LT Case No. 2022-CF-10246-A _____________________________

ALIJAH GADSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. London M. Kite, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Alijah Gadson, Sneads, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

April 25, 2025

PER CURIAM.

Alijah Gadson appeals his judgment and sentence following a jury trial. Gadson was found guilty of attempted manslaughter (with a special finding that he carried a firearm) and shooting or throwing deadly missiles. He was sentenced to fifteen years on both counts to run consecutively. The State requested, and the trial court awarded, $5,132.43 costs of prosecution; the written cost order included an award for $100 of prosecution costs as well as the requested $5,132.43.

We affirm Gadson’s judgment and sentence, but remand for a corrected judgment striking the duplicative $100 of prosecution costs, as the statute does not allow for the imposition of both the standard $100 prosecution costs and the requested higher amount. See § 938.27(8), Fla. Stat. (2024) (“Costs for the state attorney must be set in all cases at no less than . . . $100 per case when a felony offense is charged . . . . The court may set a higher amount upon a showing of sufficient proof of higher costs incurred.”).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

MAKAR, WALLIS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Alijah Gadson v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alijah-gadson-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.