Alicia Midkiff v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 4, 2015·No. 03-14-00445-CR·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-14-00445-CR 6356465 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/4/2015 4:55:14 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK No. 03-14-00445-CR ALICIA MIDKIFF § IN THE COURT FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS § OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/4/2015 4:55:14 PM V. § JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk § THIRD JUDICIAL THE STATE OF § TEXAS § DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL

In compliance with the requirements of Rule 68 of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure, I, Crystal D. Murray, court-appointed counsel for

appellant, Alicia Midkiff, in the above referenced appeal, do hereby verify,

in writing, to the Court that I have:

1. informed appellant of her right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and;

2. mailed appellant a copy of the opinion and judgment, certified, return receipt requested.;

3. However, due to counsel’s vacation, appellant was mailed the copies of the opinion and judgment six days after the judgment was rendered, as opposed to the proscribed five days. Respectfully submitted,

/s/Crystal D. Murray Crystal D. Murray

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alicia Midkiff v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Alicia Midkiff v. State (Alicia Midkiff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.