Alicia Bloise v. Q4 Generational Wealth, Inc., et al.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedDecember 2, 2025
Docket1:22-cv-10488
StatusUnknown

This text of Alicia Bloise v. Q4 Generational Wealth, Inc., et al. (Alicia Bloise v. Q4 Generational Wealth, Inc., et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alicia Bloise v. Q4 Generational Wealth, Inc., et al., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Alicia Bloise, Plaintiff, 1:22-cv-10488 (JHR) (SDA) -against- ORDER Q4 Generational Wealth, Inc., et al., Defendants.

STEWART D. AARON, United States Magistrate Judge: WHEREAS, on September 3, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment, accompanying affirmation and exhibits (Mot., ECF No. 89; Calliste, Jr. Aff., ECF No. 90; Exs., ECF Nos. 90-1 to 90-16); and WHEREAS, in connection with the aforesaid motion, Plaintiff makes reference to a diagnosis by her doctor of “severe anxiety and depression,” as well as treatment by a social worker and/or therapist (see Calliste, Jr. Aff. ¶¶ 261-63; see also A. Bloise Decl., ECF No. 90-6, ¶¶ 105-06); and WHEREAS, Plaintiff has failed to submit in support of her motion any records from her doctor, social worker and/or therapist; and WHEREAS, if a plaintiff fails to submit medical evidence in support of an emotional distress claim, such claim will be treated as “garden variety,” thus limiting the range of damages that may be recovered on such a claim, see Caravantes v. 53rd Street Partners, LLC, No. 09-CV- 07821 (RPP), 2012 WL 3631276, at * 22 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 23, 2012); and WHEREAS, evidence for “garden variety” emotional distress claims typically is limited to the plaintiff's testimony, without requiring expert opinions or mental health records, see United States v. Asare, 476 F. Supp. 3d 20, 37 (2020). NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED, as follows: 1. If Plaintiff wishes to place her mental health in controversy, and recover greater than “garden variety” emotional distress damages, Plaintiff shall, no later than December 16, 2025, file to the ECF docket! records from Plaintiff’s doctor, social worker and therapist pertaining to her mental health during and after Plaintiff's employment at Q4 General Wealth, Inc. d/b/a Calientes Restaurant & Bar (“Q4/Calientes”), serve such records upon Q4/Calientes? and file proof of service to the ECF docket no later than December 18, 2025. 2. If the foregoing records are filed and served, Q4/Calientes and its principal, Melanie Burgos, shall treat such records as confidential and shall not disclose them to anyone in any manner. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York December 2, 2025 Lick of. 0. STEWART D. AARON United States Magistrate Judge

1 Given that the records pertain to Plaintiff's mental health, they may be filed to the ECF docket under seal. ? Plaintiff shall serve Q4/Calientes in the following manner: via first class mail at 414 City Island Ave., Bronx, NY 10464, and via email to melanieburgos613@gmail.com and calientesnyc@gmail.com.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alicia Bloise v. Q4 Generational Wealth, Inc., et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alicia-bloise-v-q4-generational-wealth-inc-et-al-nysd-2025.