Alicea v. Ogden Newspapers, Inc.

115 A.D.2d 233, 495 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54478
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1985·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and defendant’s motion granted. Memorandum: Defendant incorrectly reported that plaintiff was convicted of sale of a controlled substance, when in fact, after a trial on such charges, he has been convicted of the lesser crime of possession. A retraction was printed. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s action should have been granted because plaintiff failed to show any evidence that defendant had acted in a grossly irresponsible manner, an essential element of his cause of action (see, Chapadeau v Utica Observer-Dispatch, 38 NY2d 196). (Appeals from order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Ricotta, J.—libel.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alicea v. Ogden Newspapers, Inc., 115 A.D.2d 233, 495 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54478 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

115 A.D.2d 233 (Alicea v. Ogden Newspapers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morsette v. Final Call
278 A.D.2d 81 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Pellegrino v. Buffalo News, Inc.
265 A.D.2d 841 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)