Alice State Bank v. Houston Pasture Co.
227 F. 1015, 141 C.C.A. 662, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2374
Opinion
On the evidence, shown in the transcript the legal title to the land in controversy is in the Houston Pasture Company. The plaintiffs in error show no sufficient title by limitation. . See Hyde v. McFaddin, 140 Fed. 433, 72 C. C. A. 655. We conclude from the evidence that the judge below properly directed a verdict for defendant in error. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alice State Bank v. Houston Pasture Co., 227 F. 1015, 141 C.C.A. 662, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2374 (5th Cir. 1915).
227 F. 1015 (Alice State Bank v. Houston Pasture Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hyde v. McFaddin
140 F. 433 (Fifth Circuit, 1905)