Alice State Bank v. Houston Pasture Co.
227 F. 1015, 141 C.C.A. 662, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2374
This text of 227 F. 1015 (Alice State Bank v. Houston Pasture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Alice State Bank v. Houston Pasture Co., 227 F. 1015, 141 C.C.A. 662, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2374 (5th Cir. 1915).
Opinion
On the evidence, shown in the transcript the legal title to the land in controversy is in the Houston Pasture Company. The plaintiffs in error show no sufficient title by limitation. . See Hyde v. McFaddin, 140 Fed. 433, 72 C. C. A. 655. We conclude from the evidence that the judge below properly directed a verdict for defendant in error. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hyde v. McFaddin
140 F. 433 (Fifth Circuit, 1905)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
227 F. 1015, 141 C.C.A. 662, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alice-state-bank-v-houston-pasture-co-ca5-1915.