Alice McCourt Lamm v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Ninth Circuit

Alice McCourt Lamm v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

192 F.2d 1017

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 17, 1951·No. 12828_1·Published

Opinion

192 F.2d 1017

52-1 USTC P 9120

Alice McCourt LAMM, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 12828.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 1951.

Petition to Review a Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

Harry R. Horrow, Francis N. Marshall, Claude H. Hogan, Jr. and Thomas E. Haven, all of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Ellis N. Slack, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., A. F. Prescott, Morton K. Rothschild and Harry Marselli, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before MATHEWS, HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed on the grounds and for the reasons stated in the opinion, 15 T.C. 305.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

192 F.2d 1017

52-1 USTC P 9120

Alice McCourt LAMM, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 12828.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 1951.

Petition to Review a Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

Harry R. Horrow, Francis N. Marshall, Claude H. Hogan, Jr. and Thomas E. Haven, all of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Ellis N. Slack, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., A. F. Prescott, Morton K. Rothschild and Harry Marselli, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before MATHEWS, HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed on the grounds and for the reasons stated in the opinion, 15 T.C. 305.

Alice McCourt Lamm v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 192 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

192 F.2d 1017 (Alice McCourt Lamm v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.