Alice McCourt Lamm v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

192 F.2d 1017
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 1951
Docket12828_1
StatusPublished

This text of 192 F.2d 1017 (Alice McCourt Lamm v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alice McCourt Lamm v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 192 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1951).

Opinion

192 F.2d 1017

52-1 USTC P 9120

Alice McCourt LAMM, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 12828.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 1951.

Petition to Review a Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

Harry R. Horrow, Francis N. Marshall, Claude H. Hogan, Jr. and Thomas E. Haven, all of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Ellis N. Slack, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., A. F. Prescott, Morton K. Rothschild and Harry Marselli, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before MATHEWS, HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed on the grounds and for the reasons stated in the opinion, 15 T.C. 305.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 F.2d 1017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alice-mccourt-lamm-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca9-1951.