Alice M. Thompson v. Mel Tonasket, as Members of the Colville Business Council of the Colville Confederated Tribe, and the Colville Confederated Tribe

487 F.2d 316, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7255
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 2, 1973
Docket72-1193
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 487 F.2d 316 (Alice M. Thompson v. Mel Tonasket, as Members of the Colville Business Council of the Colville Confederated Tribe, and the Colville Confederated Tribe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alice M. Thompson v. Mel Tonasket, as Members of the Colville Business Council of the Colville Confederated Tribe, and the Colville Confederated Tribe, 487 F.2d 316, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7255 (9th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case presents the same jurisdictional question as was presented in the case of Laramie v. Nicholson, 9 Cir., 1973, 487 F.2d 315. As in that case, the trial judge held that he had no jurisdiction and dismissed the action. The judgment is reversed on the authority of Laramie v. Nicholson, supra, and of Johnson v. The Lower Elwha Tribal Community, 9 Cir., 1973, 484 F.2d 200.

*317 As in the Laramie ease, we express no opinion on the merits of the case because the trial court did not reach that question. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
487 F.2d 316, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alice-m-thompson-v-mel-tonasket-as-members-of-the-colville-business-ca9-1973.