Alice Lawson v. Ernest Boyd Collins and Ella Elizabeth Collins

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 18, 2019
Docket03-18-00652-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Alice Lawson v. Ernest Boyd Collins and Ella Elizabeth Collins (Alice Lawson v. Ernest Boyd Collins and Ella Elizabeth Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alice Lawson v. Ernest Boyd Collins and Ella Elizabeth Collins, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00652-CV

Alice Lawson, Appellant

v.

Ernest Boyd Collins and Ella Elizabeth Collins, Appellees

FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-PB-14-002129, HONORABLE STEPHEN ABLES, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on October 4, 2018.

The Clerk of this Court subsequently notified the appellant that the clerk’s record had not been filed

due to her failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the district court clerk’s fees for preparing

the clerk’s record. The notice requested that the appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record

and submit a status report regarding this appeal by January 14, 2019. Further, the notice advised

the appellant that her failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of this appeal

for want of prosecution. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed, and appellant’s counsel has

informed this Court by letter that the appellant no longer wishes to pursue this appeal.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to the appellant’s failure to

pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, the appellant has not established that she

is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See id. R. 20.1 (providing procedure for establishing

indigence on appeal). Because the appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the

clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id.

R. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: January 18, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alice Lawson v. Ernest Boyd Collins and Ella Elizabeth Collins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alice-lawson-v-ernest-boyd-collins-and-ella-elizabeth-collins-texapp-2019.