Alice A. Wright v. James P. Young

194 F.2d 885, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 421
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 1952
Docket10946
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 194 F.2d 885 (Alice A. Wright v. James P. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alice A. Wright v. James P. Young, 194 F.2d 885, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 421 (D.C. Cir. 1952).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment on a directed verdict for the defendant in a suit for personal injuries brought by a pedestrian against the driver of an automobile. We find no prejudicial error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Woods, Director of Rent Stabilization
194 F.2d 902 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 F.2d 885, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alice-a-wright-v-james-p-young-cadc-1952.