Alice A. Boyle and Carrie H. Boyle v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America

519 F.2d 551
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 29, 1975
Docket72-2690
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 519 F.2d 551 (Alice A. Boyle and Carrie H. Boyle v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alice A. Boyle and Carrie H. Boyle v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America, 519 F.2d 551 (9th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The Secretary’s decision, reported at 76 I.D. 318, must be sustained.

The Secretary’s finding that there had been no discovery of a valuable deposit of decomposed granite within the limits of appellees’ claims prior to July 23, 1955, is supported by substantial evidence. Most of appellees’ proof consisted of general unsupported claims of sales in unspecified amounts. Specifically identified sales totaled about $100 over an eight-year period. This was not enough to establish, as a matter of law, that the marketability test of United States v. Coleman, 390 U.S. 599, 88 S.Ct. 1327, 20 L.Ed.2d 170 (1968), was satisfied.

The record also supports the Secretary’s finding that the red, gold, and pink decomposed granite found on appellees’ claims was a “common variety” of stone and, by the terms of 30 U.S.C. § 611, therefore could not be the basis for a valid mining claim. The record shows that a large quantity of colored decorative decomposed granite similar to appellees’ was available from other deposits in the same general marketing area. The Secretary therefore properly compared the price of appellees’ decomposed granite only with the price of this similar decorative granite, and not with the price of all decomposed granite, in determining that appellees’ granite did not have a “distinct and special value.” Brubaker v. Morton, 500 F.2d 200 (9th Cir. 1974).

Reversed and remanded for entry of summary judgment for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J. Stacey v. Sally Jewell
692 F. App'x 363 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Tanner Companies v. Arizona State Land Department
688 P.2d 1075 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 F.2d 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alice-a-boyle-and-carrie-h-boyle-v-rogers-c-b-morton-secretary-of-the-ca9-1975.