Aliano v. Lamaina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aliano v. Lamaina

255 A.D.2d 276, 679 N.Y.S.2d 319

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 2, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D.2d 276 (Aliano v. Lamaina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aliano v. Lamaina, 255 A.D.2d 276, 679 N.Y.S.2d 319 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated March 21, 1998, as denied his cross motion for leave to file a jury demand and granted the plaintiffs cross motion to strike his demand for a jury trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s cross motion for leave to file a jury demand and in granting the plaintiffs cross motion to strike the defendant’s demand for a jury trial. Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated March 21, 1998, as denied his cross motion for leave to file a jury demand and granted the plaintiffs cross motion to strike his demand for a jury trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s cross motion for leave to file a jury demand and in granting the plaintiffs cross motion to strike the defendant’s demand for a jury trial. Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 276, 679 N.Y.S.2d 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aliano-v-lamaina-nyappdiv-1998.