Ali v. Worf

Fourth Circuit

Ali v. Worf

484 F. App'x 830

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 13, 2012·No. No. 12-1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[831]*831Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Zo Xabiere Ali appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ali v. Wmf, No. 5:12-cv-00261-D, 2012 WL 2786880 (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[831]*831Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Zo Xabiere Ali appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ali v. Wmf, No. 5:12-cv-00261-D, 2012 WL 2786880 (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ali v. Worf, 484 F. App'x 830 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

484 F. App'x 830 (Ali v. Worf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related