Ali v. Washington

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

FATHIREE ALI, ANTHONY HOFFMAN, and ROMMEL MORSHED,

Plaintiffs, Case No. 25-10846 v. Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds HEIDI WASHINGTON, et al.,

Defendants. __________________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MAY 6, 2025 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [18]

This is a pro se prisoner civil rights lawsuit. (ECF No. 1.) The case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. for all pre-trial matters. (ECF No. 13.) Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation to deny Plaintiffs’ motions for injunctive relief. (ECF No. 18.) No party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” See Hall v. Rawal, No. 09-10933, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120541, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). Nonetheless, the Court has reviewed the matter and agrees with the Magistrate Judge. Thus, the Court ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the report and recommendation (ECF No. 18). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 5, 16). SO ORDERED. s/Nancy G. Edmunds Nancy G. Edmunds United States District Judge

Dated: June 3, 2025 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on June 3, 2025, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marlena Williams Case Manager