Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ali v. State

Ali v. State

918 So. 2d 986, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 113, 2006 WL 51138
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ali v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12440 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 11, 2006·No. No. 4D04-3610·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse in part the trial court order denying appellant’s Motion for Relief, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. The state properly concedes, and we agree, that appellant’s point B is facially sufficient, requiring remand for either an evidentiary hearing or attachment of those portions of the record which conclusively refute appellant’s claim. As to points A and C, we affirm.

WARNER, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ali v. State, 918 So. 2d 986, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 113, 2006 WL 51138 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

918 So. 2d 986 (Ali v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.