Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ali v. State

Ali v. State

643 So. 2d 123, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9942, 1994 WL 561879
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 17, 1994·No. No. 94-704·Published

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

The trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for posteonviction relief is AFFIRMED without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a timely, successive 3.850 motion containing the necessary allegations under oath. Harris v. State, 596 So.2d 500 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). See also Gilliam v. State, 611 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Short v. State, 596 So.2d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Hickman v. State, 581 So.2d 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

ERVIN and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ali v. State, 643 So. 2d 123, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9942, 1994 WL 561879 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

643 So. 2d 123 (Ali v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hickman v. State
581 So. 2d 942 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Short v. State
596 So. 2d 502 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Harris v. State
596 So. 2d 500 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Gilliam v. State
611 So. 2d 90 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)