Ali v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ali v. State

643 So. 2d 123, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9942, 1994 WL 561879

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 17, 1994

DocketNo. 94-704

StatusPublished

This text of 643 So. 2d 123 (Ali v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ali v. State, 643 So. 2d 123, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9942, 1994 WL 561879 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

The trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for posteonviction relief is AFFIRMED without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a timely, successive 3.850 motion containing the necessary allegations under oath. Harris v. State, 596 So.2d 500 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). See also Gilliam v. State, 611 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Short v. State, 596 So.2d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Hickman v. State, 581 So.2d 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

ERVIN and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARFIELD, Judge.

The trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for posteonviction relief is AFFIRMED without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a timely, successive 3.850 motion containing the necessary allegations under oath. Harris v. State, 596 So.2d 500 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). See also Gilliam v. State, 611 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Short v. State, 596 So.2d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Hickman v. State, 581 So.2d 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

ERVIN and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

643 So. 2d 123, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9942, 1994 WL 561879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ali-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack