Ali v. Lyles

769 F.2d 204
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 5, 1985·No. No. 85-6257·Published·Cited by 22 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Habib Amir Abdallah Ali, a Maryland inmate, seeks to appeal the district court’s order entering summary judgment in defendants’ favor and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Judgment was entered on October 18, 1984. Ali filed his notice of appeal on February 25, 1985,* more than four months after the entry of judgment. Ali contends that this untimeliness is excusable since he had not received a copy of the district court’s judgment until January 28, 1985.

Under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), notice of appeal in a civil case must be filed in district court within thirty days from the date of the entry of judgment. Upon a showing of excusable neglect, the district court may extend the time for filing by an additional thirty days. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5). However, after the expiration of the sixty-day period, neither this Court nor the district court may grant a further extension of time. Hensley v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 651 F.2d 226, 228 (4th Cir.1981); Felix v. Cardwell, 545 F.2d 92 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 910, 97 S.Ct. 1183, 51 L.Ed.2d 587 (1977). Lack of notice of the entry of judgment does not affect the time to appeal or authorize a court to excuse a party for failure to appeal within the permissible filing period. Fed.R.Civ.P. 77(d). See also Hensley v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 651 F.2d at 229. Accordingly, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the instant appeal since Ali filed his notice of appeal well after the permissible sixty-day period.

Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ali v. Lyles, 769 F.2d 204 (4th Cir. 1985).

769 F.2d 204 (Ali v. Lyles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sack v. Central Intelligence Agency
District of Columbia, 2015
Brown v. Williams
282 F. App'x 282 (Fourth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Sellman
20 F. App'x 202 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. McNeil
Fourth Circuit, 1999
Webb v. Doe
Fourth Circuit, 1998
In re Bulldog Trucking, Inc.
89 F.3d 827 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
In re: Bulldog Trkg v.
Fourth Circuit, 1996
United States v. Charles Fields
51 F.3d 269 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Bernard Greene, A/K/A Squeaky
36 F.3d 1094 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Janie Wilson Chavez
986 F.2d 1415 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)
Connors v. Princeton Coal Group, Inc.
770 F. Supp. 1140 (S.D. West Virginia, 1991)
Dushyant Kumar Mehar v. C & P Telephone, Eep
838 F.2d 467 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)