Ali v. Kring

272 A.D.2d 422, 707 N.Y.S.2d 913, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6137
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs Sandra Elzeini and Ali Elzeini appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated May 25, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted by the appellants, and (2) an order of the same court dated October 7, 1999, which denied their motion, in effect, for reargument.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated October 7, 1999, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying re-argument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated May 25, 1999, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Under the circumstances here, where the appellants failed to respond to the defendant’s demand for a statement of the specific injuries they allegedly sustained in the underlying motor vehicle accident and thereafter failed to comply with a preliminary conference order requesting that information, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by them (see, Parish Constr. Corp. v Franlo Tile, 215 AD2d 545). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ali v. Kring, 272 A.D.2d 422, 707 N.Y.S.2d 913, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

272 A.D.2d 422 (Ali v. Kring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frost Line Refrigeration, Inc. v. Frunzi
18 A.D.3d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)