Ali v. Goord

Second Circuit

Ali v. Goord

60 F. App'x 349

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 27, 2003

DocketDocket No. 02-0066

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F. App'x 349 (Ali v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ali v. Goord, 60 F. App'x 349 (2d Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Pro se plaintiff-appellant Taliv Ah appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McAvoy, J.) entered pursuant to an unreported Decision and Order dated February 27, 2002, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. For the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough opinion, we affirm.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Pro se plaintiff-appellant Taliv Ah appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McAvoy, J.) entered pursuant to an unreported Decision and Order dated February 27, 2002, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. For the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough opinion, we affirm.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F. App'x 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ali-v-goord-ca2-2003.