Ali v. Communicar Car Service

282 A.D.2d 413, 722 N.Y.S.2d 400, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3307
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 2, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful termination of employment, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated September 18, 2000, which, upon a finding that service of process was proper, granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was, in effect, for summary judgment on the issue of back pay.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was, in effect, for summary judgment on the issue of back pay is denied, and the complaint is dismissed.

The attempt at service in this action violated CPLR 2103 (a). Accordingly, the complaint must be dismissed based on [414] improper service of process (see, Miller v Bank of N. Y. [Del], 226 AD2d 507). Ritter, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ali v. Communicar Car Service, 282 A.D.2d 413, 722 N.Y.S.2d 400, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3307 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

282 A.D.2d 413 (Ali v. Communicar Car Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munoz v. Reyes
40 A.D.3d 1059 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)