Ali Tabrizi and Dona Tabrizi v. City of Austin Greg Guernsey, in His Official Capacity as Director of Planning and Zoning Department J. Rodney Gonzales, in His Official Capacity as Acting Director of the Development Services Department And Charles Lesniak, in His Official Capacity As

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 26, 2016
Docket08-16-00209-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ali Tabrizi and Dona Tabrizi v. City of Austin Greg Guernsey, in His Official Capacity as Director of Planning and Zoning Department J. Rodney Gonzales, in His Official Capacity as Acting Director of the Development Services Department And Charles Lesniak, in His Official Capacity As (Ali Tabrizi and Dona Tabrizi v. City of Austin Greg Guernsey, in His Official Capacity as Director of Planning and Zoning Department J. Rodney Gonzales, in His Official Capacity as Acting Director of the Development Services Department And Charles Lesniak, in His Official Capacity As) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ali Tabrizi and Dona Tabrizi v. City of Austin Greg Guernsey, in His Official Capacity as Director of Planning and Zoning Department J. Rodney Gonzales, in His Official Capacity as Acting Director of the Development Services Department And Charles Lesniak, in His Official Capacity As, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

Ali Tabrizi and Dona Tabrizi, ' No. 08-16-00209-CV Appellants, ' v. Appeal from the ' City Of Austin; Greg Guernsey, in his 53rd District Court Official Capacity as Director of Planning ' and Zoning Department, et al., of Travis County, Texas ' Appellees. ' (TC# D-1-GN-15-002968)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Appellants’ unopposed motion to stay the appeal while

Appellants pursue a vested rights petition under Chapter 245 of the Local Government Code.

The motion is GRANTED. Although Appellants have not expressly requested abatement of the

appeal, we conclude it is appropriate under the circumstances. The appeal, including all

appellate deadlines, are stayed pending resolution of the Chapter 245 petition or further order of

the Court. Appellants are directed to file a motion to reinstate the appeal when the Chapter 245

proceedings have concluded.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ali Tabrizi and Dona Tabrizi v. City of Austin Greg Guernsey, in His Official Capacity as Director of Planning and Zoning Department J. Rodney Gonzales, in His Official Capacity as Acting Director of the Development Services Department And Charles Lesniak, in His Official Capacity As, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ali-tabrizi-and-dona-tabrizi-v-city-of-austin-greg-guernsey-in-his-texapp-2016.