Ali, M. v. Ct. of Com. Pleas Phila. Cty.
This text of Ali, M. v. Ct. of Com. Pleas Phila. Cty. (Ali, M. v. Ct. of Com. Pleas Phila. Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
MUSTAFA ALI, : No. 10 EM 2023 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : JUDGE JEFFREY MINEHART; : PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON : PLEAS, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2023, the “Petition for Review in the Nature of a
Complaint in Mandamus” is DENIED, and the “Application for Relief to File a Response
Nunc Pro Tunc” is DISMISSED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of
the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ali, M. v. Ct. of Com. Pleas Phila. Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ali-m-v-ct-of-com-pleas-phila-cty-pa-2023.