Ali BOURESLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMCO, Arabian American Oil Co. and Aramco Service Company, Defendants-Appellees

Fifth Circuit

Ali BOURESLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMCO, Arabian American Oil Co. and Aramco Service Company, Defendants-Appellees

863 F.2d 8, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18078, 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,681, 50 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 778, 1988 WL 137230

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 23, 1988

Docket87-2206

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 863 F.2d 8 (Ali BOURESLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMCO, Arabian American Oil Co. and Aramco Service Company, Defendants-Appellees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ali BOURESLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMCO, Arabian American Oil Co. and Aramco Service Company, Defendants-Appellees, 863 F.2d 8, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18078, 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,681, 50 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 778, 1988 WL 137230 (5th Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

ON SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH and DUHE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestions for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI