Ali Ahmed v. Bush
This text of Ali Ahmed v. Bush (Ali Ahmed v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ALL ALI BIN ALI AHMED, : et al., : : Petitioners, : : v. : Civil Action No. 05-1678 (GK) : GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., : : Respondents. : ______________________________:
ORDER
A Status Conference was held in this case on January 15, 2009,
which was open to the public. Upon consideration of the
representations of the parties, and the entire record herein, it is
hereby
ORDERED, that parties are to submit any briefing in support of
their view of the appropriate definition of “enemy combatant” by
January 28, 2009; and it is further
ORDERED, that if Petitioners choose to submit a Motion for
Additional Discovery, they shall do so by January 21, 2009.
Respondents shall file their response by February 3, 2009.
Petitioner shall file their reply, if any, by February 6, 2009.
ORDERED, that within one week of the date of this Order,
Petitioners shall provide Respondents with a realistic list that
prioritizes the exculpatory evidence they are requesting. By
January 30, 2009, Respondents will inform Petitioners as to whether
those requests can be satisfied; and it is further ORDERED, that parties shall meet and confer to narrow the
universe of facts that Petitioners will request to be de-
classified. Within one week of the date of this Order, Petitioners
shall provide Respondents with a realistic list that prioritizes
those factual issues which Petitioners request to be de-classified.
Within five business days of receiving that list, Respondents will
inform Petitioners as to whether those requests can be satisfied.
If either Petitioner is not satisfied by Respondent’s reply, he
will file a Motion to Compel as soon as possible. Respondents will
have five business days to respond to the Motion. Filings shall be
limited to 10 pages or less; and it is further
ORDERED, that Respondents will submit a detailed statement of
facts on or before February 3, 2009, presenting in numerical form,
a short statement of each material fact upon which Respondents
intend to rely in proving their case-in-chief, and they shall
identify all evidence they expect to elicit in support of those
facts, including the names of any witnesses the Respondents intend
to call. If Respondents intend to rely on any statements in
proving their case-in-chief, they shall disclose in their statement
of facts: (1) the identity of the speaker; (2) the content of the
statement; (3) the person(s) to whom the statement was made; (4)
the date and time the statement was made or adopted; and (5) the
circumstances under which such statement was made or adopted
(including the location where the statement was made). If
Respondents cannot identify the original source or any later source
-2- of the information, they must so indicate. If Respondents intend
to rely on any documents (including 302 reports), the documents
shall be produced to Petitioners’ counsel along with the statement
of facts, unless such documents were already produced, and the
relevant portions of the documents shall be identified (by page and
paragraph number) if Respondents do not intend to rely on the
entire document. Respondents may include in this statement facts
that were not included in the Factual Return; and it is further
ORDERED, that Petitioners shall file their Traverses by
February 27, 2009; and it is further
ORDERED, that parties shall file dispositive motions by March
20, 2009. Oppositions will be due by March 27, 2009; and it is
further
ORDERED, that a Motions Hearing on the dispositive motions
will take place on April 14, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. The Hearing will
be held in Courtroom 26A, and will be closed to the public so that
classified matters can be discussed. At that hearing, Respondents
will have 30 minutes to present their case, Petitioner will have 30
minutes to respond, and Respondents will be allowed 15 minutes to
reply.
ORDERED, that a further Status Conference shall be held in
this case on February 10, 2009, at 10:00 a.m.
/s/ January 21, 2009 Gladys Kessler United States District Judge Copies to: Attorneys of Record via ECF
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ali Ahmed v. Bush, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ali-ahmed-v-bush-dcd-2009.