Alhaji Cham v. Eric Holder, Jr.

367 F. App'x 722
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 10, 2010·No. 09-1446·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alhaji Cham, a citizen of Gambia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief-under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We conclude substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Cham did not meet his burden of proof for asylum. See Khrystotodorov v. Mukasey, 551 F.3d 775, 781 (8th Cir.2008) (standard of review); Ming Ming Wijono v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 868, 872 (8th Cir.2006)' (there must be some nexus between persecution and protected ground). Further, because Cham failed to meet the burden of proof on his asylum claim, his claim for withholding of removal necessarily fails as well, see Gitimu v. Holder, 581 F.3d 769, 774 (8th Cir.2009), and we see no basis in the record for CAT relief, see Miah v. Mukasey, 519 F.3d 784, 786-88 (8th Cir. 2008).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alhaji Cham v. Eric Holder, Jr., 367 F. App'x 722 (8th Cir. 2010).

367 F. App'x 722 (Alhaji Cham v. Eric Holder, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miah v. Mukasey
519 F.3d 784 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Gitimu v. Holder
581 F.3d 769 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
Khrystotodorov v. Mukasey
551 F.3d 775 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)