Algonquin Music, Inc. v. Mills Music, Inc.

S.D. New York

Algonquin Music, Inc. v. Mills Music, Inc.

93 F. Supp. 268, 86 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 481, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2305

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedJuly 11, 1950

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 93 F. Supp. 268 (Algonquin Music, Inc. v. Mills Music, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Algonquin Music, Inc. v. Mills Music, Inc., 93 F. Supp. 268, 86 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 481, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2305 (S.D.N.Y. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

NOONAN, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendants for an order dismissing the complaint in that it appears thereon that plaintiff has not complied with the provisions of 17 U.S.C.A. § 13. This section provides in part:

“No action or proceeding shall be maintained for infringement of copyright in any work until the provisions of this title with respect to the deposit of copies and registration of such work shall have been complied with.”

Plaintiff alleges a proper deposit of two copies of the work but admits that a certificate of registration has not been obtained.

The procural of the latter is a prerequisite for the maintenance of this action. Lumiere v. Pathe Exchange, Inc., 2 Cir., 275 F. 428.

Although plaintiff claims it has applied for such certificate, it does not appear that plaintiff could replead to correct the defect because as yet proper registration is- lacking.

Therefore, the motion is granted and the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Cf. Rosedale v. News Syndicate Co., D.C., 39 F.Supp. 357.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI