Alfrey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Alfrey v. State

435 So. 2d 971, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22400

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 9, 1983

DocketNo. 82-2205

StatusPublished

This text of 435 So. 2d 971 (Alfrey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alfrey v. State, 435 So. 2d 971, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22400 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

BASKIN, Judge.

During the hearing on appellant’s motions to suppress and to dismiss, his counsel stipulated that the issues were dispositive and that he would not need a jury. The state argues that by these actions appellant’s counsel waived appellant’s right to a speedy trial. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191. We disagree. See State v. Ansley, 349 So.2d 837 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BASKIN, Judge.

During the hearing on appellant’s motions to suppress and to dismiss, his counsel stipulated that the issues were dispositive and that he would not need a jury. The state argues that by these actions appellant’s counsel waived appellant’s right to a speedy trial. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191. We disagree. See State v. Ansley, 349 So.2d 837 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

435 So. 2d 971, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfrey-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack