ALFREDO SALINAS v. U. S. BANK TRUST, N. A.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 2019
Docket17-4902
StatusPublished

This text of ALFREDO SALINAS v. U. S. BANK TRUST, N. A. (ALFREDO SALINAS v. U. S. BANK TRUST, N. A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ALFREDO SALINAS v. U. S. BANK TRUST, N. A., (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ALFREDO A. SALINAS and ) GUADALOUPE SALINAS, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4902 ) U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ )

Opinion filed November 1, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Larry Helms, Judge.

Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa (withdrew after briefing), and Latasha Scott of Lord Scott, PLLC, Tampa (withdrew after briefing); Alfredo A. Salinas, pro se, and Guadaloupe Salinas, pro se.

Matthew A. Ciccio and Wm. David Newman, Jr. (substituted as counsel of record) of Aldridge Pite, LLP, Delray Beach, for Appellee.

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Alfredo and Guadaloupe Salinas appeal the final judgment of foreclosure

entered in favor of U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. We affirm without comment on all issues

other than the attorney's fee award, which we reverse. The foreclosure judgment, entered after a nonjury trial, included an award

of attorney's fees based solely on an objected-to affidavit by the attorney for U.S. Bank

Trust. No other evidence was submitted in support of the claim for fees. An attorney's

fee award must be supported by expert testimony from an attorney who is not involved

in the underlying case. Raff v. Citimortgage, Inc., 272 So. 3d 859, 859 (Fla. 2d DCA

2019) (citing Sourcetrack LLC v. Ariba, Inc., 34 So. 3d 766, 768 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)).

Accordingly, we reverse the attorney's fee award and remand with instructions to reduce

the amount of the final judgment by $14,341.60.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SILBERMAN and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SOURCETRACK, LLC v. Ariba, Inc.
34 So. 3d 766 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
ROBERT F. RAFF & BERNICE R. RAFF v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
272 So. 3d 859 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ALFREDO SALINAS v. U. S. BANK TRUST, N. A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfredo-salinas-v-u-s-bank-trust-n-a-fladistctapp-2019.