Alfredo Rodriguez v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility

161 F.3d 763, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31651, 1998 WL 887152
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 21, 1998·No. 98-2252·Published·Cited by 25 cases

Opinion

*764 PER CURIAM:

Alfredo Rodriguez appeals from Judge So-tomayor’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus as untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Rodriguez contends that application of the one-year statute of limitations in Section 2244 effects an unconstitutional suspension of the writ of habeas corpus. See U.S. Const., Art. I, § 9, cl. 2. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Rodriguez v. Artuz, 990 F.Supp. 275 (S.D.N.Y.1998).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alfredo Rodriguez v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, 161 F.3d 763, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31651, 1998 WL 887152 (2d Cir. 1998).

161 F.3d 763 (Alfredo Rodriguez v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Danielson v. McCarthy
N.D. New York, 2025
Bryant v. United States
Second Circuit, 2020
In re DeMarco
733 F.3d 457 (Second Circuit, 2013)
Quezada v. Smith
624 F.3d 514 (Second Circuit, 2010)
Charriez v. Greiner
265 F.R.D. 70 (E.D. New York, 2010)
Ruiz-Martinez v. Mukasey
516 F.3d 102 (Second Circuit, 2008)
Lisker v. Knowles
463 F. Supp. 2d 1008 (C.D. California, 2006)
Wyche v. United States
317 F. Supp. 2d 1 (District of Columbia, 2004)
Murphy v. Strack
9 F. App'x 71 (Second Circuit, 2001)
Matias v. Artuz
8 F. App'x 9 (Second Circuit, 2001)
Mathilde Muniz v. United States
236 F.3d 122 (Second Circuit, 2001)
Harrison v. Artuz
105 F. Supp. 2d 101 (E.D. New York, 2000)
Paul Clark v. James Stinson, Superintendent
214 F.3d 315 (Second Circuit, 2000)
Thomas Lucidore v. New York State Division of Parole
209 F.3d 107 (Second Circuit, 2000)