Alfredo Reyes-Verastica v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 425 F. App'x 593 (Alfredo Reyes-Verastica v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Alfredo Reyes-Verastica, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the former Legalization Appeals Unit’s (“LAU”) order dismissing his appeal from the denial of his application for temporary resident status as a Special Agricultural Worker (“SAW”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1160(e)(3) and 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Perez-Martin v. Ashcroft, 394 F.3d 752, 758 (9th Cir.2005), we deny the petition for review.
The LAU did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Reyes-Verastica’s SAW appeal where he provided insufficient evidence to establish that he performed qualifying agricultural work during the statutory time period. See id. at 759-60 (to overcome derogatory government evidence, SAW applicant must provide sufficient evidence to show qualifying employment “as a matter of just and reasonable inference”) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1160(b)(3)(B)(iii)).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
425 F. App'x 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfredo-reyes-verastica-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.