Alfredo Regalado, Individually and D/B/A 4 Aces Bail Bonds v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 8, 2007
Docket13-07-00544-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Alfredo Regalado, Individually and D/B/A 4 Aces Bail Bonds v. State (Alfredo Regalado, Individually and D/B/A 4 Aces Bail Bonds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alfredo Regalado, Individually and D/B/A 4 Aces Bail Bonds v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-07-00544-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

ALFREDO REGALADO,

INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A 4 ACES BAIL BONDS, APPELLANT,



v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

_____________________________________________________________



On Appeal from the 398th District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, Alfredo Regalado, Individually and d/b/a 4 Aces Bail Bonds, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CR-0393-92-I(N). Judgment in this cause was signed on April 30, 2007. A motion for new trial was filed on May 29, 2007. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on July 30, 2007, but was not filed until September 4, 2007.

On September 7, 2007, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a)(c).



PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered

and filed this the 8th day of November, 2007.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alfredo Regalado, Individually and D/B/A 4 Aces Bail Bonds v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfredo-regalado-individually-and-dba-4-aces-bail--texapp-2007.