Alfredo Ramirez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 25, 2004
Docket13-03-00597-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Alfredo Ramirez v. State (Alfredo Ramirez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alfredo Ramirez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-03-597-CR


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________


ALFREDO RAMIREZ,                                                         Appellant,


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                      Appellee.


On appeal from the 36th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam

         Appellant, Alfredo Ramirez, attempts to appeal a conviction for indecency with a child. The trial court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

         On January 6, 2004, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

         On January 14, 2004, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response fails to establish either that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

         The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

    PER CURIAM

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum opinion delivered

and filed this the 25th day of March, 2004.


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alfredo Ramirez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfredo-ramirez-v-state-texapp-2004.