Alfredo Gonzalez v. State
This text of Alfredo Gonzalez v. State (Alfredo Gonzalez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-17-00373-CR
ALFREDO GONZALEZ, Appellant § On Appeal from the 355th District Court
§ of Hood County (CR13504)
V. § February 28, 2019
§ Per Curiam
THE STATE OF TEXAS § (nfp)
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there
was no error in the trial court’s count two judgment for unlawful possession of a
firearm. That judgment is affirmed.
This court holds that there was error in the trial court’s count one judgment for
possession of four or more, but less than two hundred, grams of methamphetamine
with intent to deliver and incorporated order to withdraw funds. The
methamphetamine-possession judgment and incorporated order to withdraw funds
are modified to delete the $180 restitution award, $12 restitution installment fee, $30
witness conveyance fee, and $45 of the arrest fee. The amended bill of costs is modified in the same manner (except for the restitution) so that it assesses only $429
in total court costs. It is ordered that the trial court’s methamphetamine-possession
judgment is affirmed as modified.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alfredo Gonzalez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfredo-gonzalez-v-state-texapp-2019.