Alfred v. State
233 S.W.3d 772, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295, 2007 WL 2769499
Opinion
ORDER
Roland Alfred appeals the motion court’s denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alfred v. State, 233 S.W.3d 772, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295, 2007 WL 2769499 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
233 S.W.3d 772 (Alfred v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Al-Naumany v. Treasurer of the State, Custodian of the Second Injury Fund
233 S.W.3d 772 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)