Alfred v. State
233 S.W.3d 772, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295, 2007 WL 2769499
This text of 233 S.W.3d 772 (Alfred v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Alfred v. State, 233 S.W.3d 772, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295, 2007 WL 2769499 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
Opinion
ORDER
Roland Alfred appeals the motion court’s denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Al-Naumany v. Treasurer of the State, Custodian of the Second Injury Fund
233 S.W.3d 772 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
233 S.W.3d 772, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295, 2007 WL 2769499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfred-v-state-moctapp-2007.