Alfred v. State
820 So. 2d 1084, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10063, 2002 WL 1559703
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 17, 2002
DocketNo. 3D01-3112
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 820 So. 2d 1084 (Alfred v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Alfred v. State, 820 So. 2d 1084, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10063, 2002 WL 1559703 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
Jerry Alfred appeals his conviction and sentence asserting ineffectiveness of trial counsel. We affirm without prejudice to pursue that claim in a post-conviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jerry Neil Alfred v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Eleventh Circuit, 2020
Jerry Neil Alfred v. Florida Supreme Court
Eleventh Circuit, 2018
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
820 So. 2d 1084, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10063, 2002 WL 1559703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfred-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.