Alfred v. McNeil

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Alfred v. McNeil

43 So. 3d 799, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12159, 2010 WL 3239026

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 18, 2010

Docket1D10-1429

StatusPublished

This text of 43 So. 3d 799 (Alfred v. McNeil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alfred v. McNeil, 43 So. 3d 799, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12159, 2010 WL 3239026 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

*800 PER CURIAM.

We hereby grant the petition for writ of mandamus. The circuit court shall rule on the pending motion for rehearing within a reasonable time, not to exceed 30 days from issuance of mandate in this cause. Because we are confident that the circuit court will issue a ruling, we withhold issuance of the formal writ.

HAWKES, C.J., KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*800 PER CURIAM.

We hereby grant the petition for writ of mandamus. The circuit court shall rule on the pending motion for rehearing within a reasonable time, not to exceed 30 days from issuance of mandate in this cause. Because we are confident that the circuit court will issue a ruling, we withhold issuance of the formal writ.

HAWKES, C.J., KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 So. 3d 799, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12159, 2010 WL 3239026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfred-v-mcneil-fladistctapp-2010.