Alfred Rodriguez, Jr. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 25, 2014·No. 01-14-00394-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00394-CR Style: Alfredo Rodriguez, Jr. v The State of Texas Date motion filed*: September 22, 2014 Type of motion: Fourth motion for extension of time to file reporter’s record Party filing motion: Court reporter, Patricia Palmer Document to be filed: Reporter’s record

If motion to extend time: Original due date: June 9, 2014 Number of extensions granted: 3 Current Due date: September 11, 2014 Date Requested: October 11, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted  Denied  Other: _____________________________________ Although we previously ordered the court reporter’s record filed by no later than September 11, 2014 and stated that no further extensions would be granted, the Court reporter now requests, without providing any explanation of the need for a further extension, an extension of time until October 11, 2014. The motion is denied. Unless the record is filed within 10 days of the date of this order, we may either require the court reporter to appear before this Court to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court or refer the case to the trial court for contempt proceedings.

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack  Acting individually

Date: September 25, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alfred Rodriguez, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Alfred Rodriguez, Jr. v. State (Alfred Rodriguez, Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.