Alfred O. Ward v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Alfred O. Ward v. United States

288 F.2d 620

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 25, 1961

Docket18448

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 288 F.2d 620 (Alfred O. Ward v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alfred O. Ward v. United States, 288 F.2d 620 (5th Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks a reversal of his conviction of the offense of possession of property used or intended to be used in violation of the Internal Revenue laws, 26 U.S.C.A. § 5686. The appellant was found in a truck with 3000 pounds of sugar, the truck having been driven to the location of a moonshine still, and then driven away from the site when those in the truck discovered they had been observed by persons who they later learned were police officers. The appellant moved to suppress the sugar as evidence and for its return, on the ground that the search of the truck and the seizure of the sugar were invalid. The motion was denied and the correctness of this ruling is the basis for the appeal. It would not be helpful to recite the evidence which was before the district court. That evidence was such as clearly showed that there was probable *621 cause for the belief entertained by the officers that the truck contained sugar to be used in making moonshine whiskey at an illicit still.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks a reversal of his conviction of the offense of possession of property used or intended to be used in violation of the Internal Revenue laws, 26 U.S.C.A. § 5686. The appellant was found in a truck with 3000 pounds of sugar, the truck having been driven to the location of a moonshine still, and then driven away from the site when those in the truck discovered they had been observed by persons who they later learned were police officers. The appellant moved to suppress the sugar as evidence and for its return, on the ground that the search of the truck and the seizure of the sugar were invalid. The motion was denied and the correctness of this ruling is the basis for the appeal. It would not be helpful to recite the evidence which was before the district court. That evidence was such as clearly showed that there was probable *621 cause for the belief entertained by the officers that the truck contained sugar to be used in making moonshine whiskey at an illicit still.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 F.2d 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfred-o-ward-v-united-states-ca5-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack