Alfred Lee Walker v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 9, 2005
Docket04-04-00749-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Alfred Lee Walker v. State (Alfred Lee Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alfred Lee Walker v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION


No. 04-04-00749-CR


Alfred Lee WALKER,

Appellant


v.


The STATE of Texas,

Appellee


From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2003-CR-5214

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Judge Presiding



PER CURIAM

Sitting:            Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed:   February 9, 2005


DISMISSED


            Defendant Alfred Lee Walker pled nolo contendere to credit/debit card abuse, and was sentenced within the terms of a plea bargain. Defendant timely filed a general notice of appeal. The trial court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal states: “the defendant has waived the right of appeal” and that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain and a written waiver of appeal, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that defendant waived his right to appeal and that appellant’s case is a plea bargain case and he does not have a right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

            Rule 25.2(d) provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, on December 16, 2004, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order); Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1. No amended trial court certification has been filed; therefore, this appeal is dismissed.

DO NOT PUBLISH



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alfred Lee Walker v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfred-lee-walker-v-state-texapp-2005.