Alfred King v. Ralph Smith, Business Administrator
This text of 815 F.2d 704 (Alfred King v. Ralph Smith, Business Administrator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Alfred KING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ralph SMITH, Business Administrator, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 86-3963.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 19, 1987.
Before ENGEL and GUY, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This case has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Although an informal brief was requested by the Court, no brief was filed. Upon examination of the motion for counsel and the record, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
The plaintiff initiated a civil rights complaint alleging that defendant violated his civil rights by not taking him on March 4, 1985, to Columbus for a doctor's appointment. A review of the record indicates that the district court did not err in dismissing the civil rights action.
It is ORDERED that the motion for counsel be denied and the judgment of the district court be affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court's decision. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
815 F.2d 704, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18196, 1987 WL 36816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfred-king-v-ralph-smith-business-administrator-ca6-1987.