Alfred James Williams, Jr. v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Alfred James Williams, Jr. v. United States

309 F.2d 890

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 28, 1962

Docket19904_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 309 F.2d 890 (Alfred James Williams, Jr. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alfred James Williams, Jr. v. United States, 309 F.2d 890 (5th Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court refused to entertain this motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, under the authority of the provision of that Section stating, “The sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner.” We conclude that in following this course of action the trial court did not commit error.

The judgment is

Affix'med.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court refused to entertain this motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, under the authority of the provision of that Section stating, “The sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner.” We conclude that in following this course of action the trial court did not commit error.

The judgment is

Affix'med.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 F.2d 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfred-james-williams-jr-v-united-states-ca5-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack