Alfred J. Vincent v. Ohio Valley Medical Center, Inc. Elba Gillenwater James Seibert

905 F.2d 1533, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 7213, 1990 WL 74427
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 4, 1990
Docket88-3102
StatusUnpublished

This text of 905 F.2d 1533 (Alfred J. Vincent v. Ohio Valley Medical Center, Inc. Elba Gillenwater James Seibert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alfred J. Vincent v. Ohio Valley Medical Center, Inc. Elba Gillenwater James Seibert, 905 F.2d 1533, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 7213, 1990 WL 74427 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

905 F.2d 1533
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Alfred J. VINCENT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
OHIO VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, INC.; Elba Gillenwater; James
Seibert, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-3102.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 31, 1990.
Decided May 4, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. William M. Kidd, District Judge. (C/A No. 85-122-W-K)

Alfred J. Vincent, appellant pro se.

Jeffrey Michael Wakefield, Kay, Casto, Chaney, Love & Wise, Charleston, W.V., Gordon Harrison Copland, Steptoe & Johnson, Clarksburg, W.V., for appellees.

N.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Alfred J. Vincent appeals from the district court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment against Vincent's due process, breach of contract, antitrust, and attorney malpractice claims. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Vincent v. Ohio Valley Medical Center, C/A No. 85-122-W-K (N.D.W.Va. Apr. 14, 1988).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

In light of our disposition, Vincent's motion to order the recusal of Judge Kidd is dismissed as moot

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Walker (Rico Orlando)
905 F.2d 1533 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
905 F.2d 1533, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 7213, 1990 WL 74427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfred-j-vincent-v-ohio-valley-medical-center-inc-elba-gillenwater-ca4-1990.