Alfred Greenwood v. Marvin Greer and Wilko Corporation

371 F.2d 526
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 1967
Docket16130
StatusPublished

This text of 371 F.2d 526 (Alfred Greenwood v. Marvin Greer and Wilko Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alfred Greenwood v. Marvin Greer and Wilko Corporation, 371 F.2d 526 (3d Cir. 1967).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

In this extremely well argued appeal, on the whole record there would be no justification for our holding that the judge committed clear error in submitting the issues of negligence and contributory negligence to the jury for the decision of that body. In any event that question is not properly before us in the trial posture of this case. Sokol v. Gussack, et al., 367 F.2d 576 (3 Cir. 1966).

The interrogation of the jury panel by the Court was proper under Rule 47(a) F.R. Civil Procedure. United States v. Woods, 364 F.2d 481 (3 Cir. 1966). Under plaintiff’s proofs the damages awarded by the jury are not excessive.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. John Woods
364 F.2d 481 (Third Circuit, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 F.2d 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfred-greenwood-v-marvin-greer-and-wilko-corporation-ca3-1967.