Alfred Eugene Cardenas, Caleb Cruz Cardenas, and All Other Occupants v. Arthur Schwartz

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00174-CV ___________________________

ALFRED EUGENE CARDENAS, CALEB CRUZ CARDENAS, AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellants

V.

ARTHUR SCHWARTZ, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Parker County, Texas Trial Court No. CA-24-037

Before Bassel, Womack and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellants’ brief was due on May 29, 2025. On June 6, 2025, we notified

Appellants that their brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R.

App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

unless, within ten days, Appellants filed with the court an appellants’ brief and an

accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an

extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have

received no response.

Because Appellants have failed to file a brief even after we afforded an

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal.

Delivered: June 26, 2025