Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba
This text of 416 U.S. 981 (Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted. Counsel in this case are directed to brief and argue the following questions:
1. Can statements by counsel for the Republic of Cuba, that petitioner’s unjúst enrichment countercláim would not be honored, constitute an act of state?
2. If so, is an exception to the act of state doctrine created, under First National City Bank v. Banco Nacional de Cuba, 406 U. S. 759 (1972), where petitioner’s counterclaim does not exceed the net balance owed to Cuba on its claims by petitioner’s codefendants, and where all claims and counterclaims arise out of the subject matter in litigation in this case?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
416 U.S. 981, 94 S. Ct. 2382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfred-dunhill-of-london-inc-v-republic-of-cuba-scotus-1974.