Alfred Curtis Mack v. State of Ohio

280 F.2d 425, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4300
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 13, 1960
Docket14045
StatusPublished

This text of 280 F.2d 425 (Alfred Curtis Mack v. State of Ohio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alfred Curtis Mack v. State of Ohio, 280 F.2d 425, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4300 (6th Cir. 1960).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be and is hereby affirmed in accordance with the order of Judge Underwood.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 F.2d 425, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfred-curtis-mack-v-state-of-ohio-ca6-1960.