Alfred Curtis Mack v. State of Ohio

Sixth Circuit

Alfred Curtis Mack v. State of Ohio

280 F.2d 425, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4300

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided June 13, 1960·No. 14045·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be and is hereby affirmed in accordance with the order of Judge Underwood.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be and is hereby affirmed in accordance with the order of Judge Underwood.

Alfred Curtis Mack v. State of Ohio, 280 F.2d 425, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4300 (6th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

280 F.2d 425 (Alfred Curtis Mack v. State of Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related